🔗 Share this article

When I am a Dungeon Master, I historically avoided heavy use of chance during my D&D adventures. I preferred was for story direction and session development to be determined by player choice instead of random chance. Recently, I decided to change my approach, and I'm truly pleased with the outcome.

The Catalyst: Observing an Improvised Tool

A well-known streamed game showcases a DM who often calls for "fate rolls" from the players. He does this by picking a polyhedral and outlining possible results contingent on the roll. While it's essentially no distinct from rolling on a pre-generated chart, these get invented in the moment when a player's action doesn't have a obvious outcome.

I decided to try this technique at my own game, primarily because it seemed interesting and offered a break from my normal practice. The experience were eye-opening, prompting me to think deeply about the ongoing tension between planning and improvisation in a D&D campaign.

A Powerful Story Beat

In a recent session, my group had survived a city-wide conflict. When the dust settled, a player inquired after two friendly NPCs—a sibling duo—had lived. In place of choosing an outcome, I let the dice decide. I asked the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. The stakes were: on a 1-4, both died; a middling roll, only one would die; on a 10+, they made it.

The player rolled a 4. This resulted in a profoundly moving moment where the adventurers found the bodies of their allies, still holding hands in death. The group conducted funeral rites, which was particularly significant due to prior character interactions. In a concluding reward, I chose that the forms were miraculously restored, showing a enchanted item. By chance, the item's magical effect was exactly what the party required to resolve another major story problem. One just script this type of perfect story beats.

Sharpening Your Improvisation

This incident caused me to question if chance and spontaneity are truly the essence of tabletop RPGs. Even if you are a prep-heavy DM, your improvisation muscles need exercise. Groups often excel at derailing the most carefully laid narratives. Therefore, a effective DM must be able to pivot effectively and create details in the moment.

Employing on-the-spot randomization is a fantastic way to train these talents without straying too much outside your usual style. The key is to apply them for low-stakes situations that don't fundamentally change the session's primary direction. To illustrate, I would not employ it to determine if the main villain is a traitor. Instead, I could use it to determine whether the party enter a room right after a major incident occurs.

Empowering Player Agency

This technique also serves to make players feel invested and cultivate the sensation that the adventure is alive, progressing in reaction to their choices in real-time. It prevents the feeling that they are merely actors in a pre-written narrative, thereby bolstering the cooperative foundation of storytelling.

This philosophy has long been integral to the original design. Early editions were enamored with charts, which made sense for a playstyle focused on dungeon crawling. Although contemporary D&D frequently focuses on narrative and role-play, leading many DMs to feel they require detailed plans, this isn't always the best approach.

Striking the Healthy Equilibrium

Absolutely nothing wrong with doing your prep. Yet, there is also no issue with letting go and allowing the whim of chance to determine certain outcomes rather than you. Authority is a big aspect of a DM's role. We require it to manage the world, yet we can be reluctant to cede it, in situations where doing so might improve the game.

A piece of recommendation is this: Have no fear of letting go of the reins. Embrace a little chance for smaller details. It may create that the surprising result is infinitely more powerful than anything you could have scripted on your own.