🔗 Share this article

The number of guaranteed positions for Māori representatives on NZ local authorities will be cut by more than half, after a controversial legislative amendment that forced municipal councils to submit the future of hard-won Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Historical Context on Māori Wards

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have multiple councillors based on local population numbers, were created in 2001 to give Māori electors the option to elect a guaranteed Indigenous council member in municipal and provincial governments. Originally, local governments were only able to establish a Indigenous seat by initially putting it to a public vote in their region. Local populations frequently devoted considerable time generating local support and urging their councils to create Māori wards.

Legislative Shifts and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the former administration allowed municipal authorities to establish a Māori ward without first requiring them to subject it to a public vote.

However, this year, the current administration overturned the policy, stating local residents ought to determine whether to introduce Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The coalition’s law change mandated local authorities that had established a ward under Labour’s rules to conduct decisive public votes concurrently with the local body elections, which concluded on 11 October. Of 42 councils participating in the public vote, 17 voted to keep their seats, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – showing numerous areas against guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes provided “a crucial move in restoring community self-determination.”

Opposition parties however have condemned the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the current administration has implemented extensive reversals to measures designed to improve Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. The government has said it wants to terminate “ethnic-specific” approaches, and asserts it is dedicated to enhancing results for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the public votes were split down urban-rural lines – six of the seven cities mandated to hold referendums supported Māori wards, while countryside areas skewed heavily towards removing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Māori wards that had only just come in – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”

Voter Turnout and Concerns

This year’s local government elections registered the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with under one-third of eligible voters participating, prompting calls for an overhaul.

This approach had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are able to create other types of electoral districts – including countryside seats – without first requiring a community ballot. The disparate requirements placed on Indigenous representation suggested the government was singling out Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This statement concerned the 17 areas that chose to keep their seats.