As a Hardcore Free-Market Advocate, Yet Universal Medicare Is the Optimal Hope for US Healthcare

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. ACA. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. FSA. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? It's understandable. Who understands this complex system? Certainly not the average business owner. Neither the average worker. Choosing the right healthcare insurance for our business – or for our families – seems like it requires advanced expertise in medical insurance.

Our Healthcare System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Expensive

Based on a recent study, typical households pays $27,000 each year for their health insurance (up 6% compared to last year). The average company healthcare expense is expected to surpass $seventeen thousand for each worker in 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Now federal operations is shut down due to partisan disputes regarding subsidies that experts say could cause premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Will We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

When will we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer since this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm proposing for our current Medicare program – an established insurance framework – merely extend to include all citizens. The existing system remains intact. The way our healthcare providers receive payment would change. Believe me, they will adjust.

The Way National Health Insurance Would Work

A national health insurance program would need contributions from employees and employers. In comparable systems, an employee earning moderate income must contribute approximately 5.3% toward medical coverage. Their employer pays approximately 13.75%.

Does this appear like a lot? Unless you contrast it to what the typical American pays. I know multiple businesses that are easily contributing between 8% to 15% of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. Remember that in comprehensive systems, these contributions include pension plans, illness coverage, parental benefits and unemployment benefits along with funding healthcare facilities. When including those costs versus what we pay on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Execution for America

In the US, universal healthcare funding would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It should be means-based – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. This includes both worker and employer contribution. Similar to much of our government's defense, IT, welfare services and transportation services, the program should be outsourced to third-party administrators rather than a government office.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program would be a huge benefit for entrepreneurs like mine. It would put us on a level playing field with our larger competitors who can afford better plans. It would make management much easier (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to social security and healthcare taxes, rather than separate payments to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would enable simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, instead of enduring the complex (and fruitless) process of bargaining with the big insurance providers required annually each year. Due to simplification, there would be improved comprehension about benefits among workers – as opposed to existing arrangements which require them to decipher the complications of current options. Additionally there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for companies as we no longer have access to our employees' health histories for purposes of risk assessment and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as they get. However I recognize that public institutions play important functions in our lives, from providing defense to supporting essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone via universal healthcare strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, easier system for small businesses that employ more than half of American employees and fund half of our GDP. It makes it possible for workers to be healthier, come to work more often and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Exist a million considerations I'm not addressing? Of course there are. Given rising medical expenses we've seen in recent years, it's clear that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning effectively. And I realize that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes can be readily adopted. However extending universal Medicare, even with increased taxation that would be incurred, would still be a superior and more affordable approach both for controlling healthcare costs but providing access for all citizens.

Time for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, must reduce our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't so great. We rank well below many other countries with the best healthcare globally, based on comprehensive research. Perhaps a positive aspect in this present circumstances is that we take serious examination at ourselves and acknowledge that big changes are necessary.

Eric Osborn
Eric Osborn

A passionate gaming expert and content creator, Lena explores the latest trends in digital entertainment and shares insights with her audience.